The neighbor across the street finally came over to introduce himself fifteen months after we moved in. Oh. I suppose we could have walked over and extended the hand of friendship first, but we didn’t. We see each other from a distance and have raised a hand in greeting many times. But the neighbor finally made the first move. And somehow the conversation quickly circled to the fact that the person who had formerly lived in the house next door to us had filed a lawsuit against him. And the suit went on for five expensive years. Oh. This man who stood in our driveway had won in multiple courts, but it came at a cost for both him and the woman who sued him. He lost five years without a floor in his barn. She lost her home.
The lawsuit? She sued him because he built a small barn that blocked her view of the lake. Honestly. I can see her point. The barn isn’t a thing of beauty. And it does partially block even my view of the lake. But the man who owned the property built the barn without asking anyone’s permission. It was his property to use as he saw fit. Even if it disgruntled the neighbor. It’s easy to say that the rest of the neighbors were glad when she was forced to move out of her home. It’s called foreclosure. All because of an unnecessary lawsuit. Yes. She lost her home because she put all her money into a frivolous lawsuit that she eventually lost. Even the highest court in the state thought her lawsuit was ridiculous and declined to review it.
What is peace? Is it even possible these days to declare peace? I know it isn’t peace when two opposing sides won’t even speak to each other. Or when they cut each other off from having a relationship. I know it isn’t a peaceful protest when there is gunfire and violence and burning buildings. It isn’t peace when one neighbor files a lawsuit against someone across the street.
According to Merriam-Webster, the current definition is a state of tranquility or peace such as freedom from civil disturbance; a state of security or order within a community provided for by law or custom; freedom from being disturbed or bothered by people, noise, etc.; freedom from disquieting thoughts or emotions; harmony in personal relations; a state or period of mutual concord between governments; a pact or agreement to end hostilities between those who have been at war or are in a state of enmity; or is used interjectionally to ask for silence or calm or as a greeting or farewell.
It seems today there are conflicting thoughts about peace. There is a new unwritten definition that says two parties must mutually agree for there to be peace, particularly in political and cultural views. If there is any hint of disagreement, then there is no peace. It’s all out war. We read of examples of failures of this type of “peace” in the news most every day. It seems that today we can’t have peace unless everyone agrees. And if there is disagreement, one person or party is ousted or destroyed. It doesn’t matter who they are or what the relationship previously looked like.
Peace I leave with you; my peace I give to you. Not as the world gives do I give to you. Let not your hearts be troubled, neither let them be afraid. John 14:27
So then we look at the life of Jesus. And we read of two seemingly conflicting thoughts of peace relating to his life and mission on this earth.
We read the Christmas story in Luke 2:1-40. The night Jesus was born, shepherds were in the fields watching their sheep. Suddenly an angel appeared under the cover of darkness and proclaimed a message the shepherds didn’t quite understand. Yet they believed what the were told. Then a host of angels appeared praised God saying, “Glory to God in the highest , and on earth peace, good will toward men.”
Ten chapters later in Luke 12, we read that Jesus said that he did not come to bring peace to the earth. He says. I come to divide people against each other. And how can we reconcile these two Scriptures? Luke 2:14 and Luke 12.
“I have come to set the world on fire, and I wish it were already burning! I have a terrible baptism of suffering ahead of me, and I am under a heavy burden until it is accomplished. Do you think I have come to bring peace to the earth? No, I have come to divide people against each other! From now on families will be split apart, three in favor of me, and two against—or two in favor and three against. ‘Father will be divided against son and son against father; mother against daughter and daughter against mother; and mother-in-law against daughter-in-law and daughter-in-law against mother-in-law.’ ”Luke 12:49-53
Jesus knew his coming to earth had an eternal purpose for all mankind. He knew his message would turn the tides. He was fulfilling the prophesies of old. And he knew his role and purpose in his Father’s plan. He couldn’t sit idly by and watch people just live the Jewish law. He came to fulfill it. He was the promised Messiah. The Savior of the world that his people had been waiting for. He knew that, yet not everyone received his message with open arms and open hearts.
These two chapters in Luke go from angelic beings proclaiming peace on the night the Promised Messiah was born to that Promised Messiah announcing that he does not bring peace to the world. What a contrast we see, but the message is really the same. The message of both announcements is that Jesus Christ was sent to the earth to bring peace to our troubled souls. But that peace can only be achieved through the acceptance of his message. And before that message is received, there will be trouble within and without us. We will have to reconcile to ourselves that in order for Jesus to be Lord of our lives, we must bow in submission to him. That is no easy task for proud individuals.
When Jesus cried out, “It is finished,” as he hung on that old rugged cross, he knew that he was paying the ultimate price for peace in men’s hearts. He knew that peace could be attained by all men, but there would be warfare of all kinds heaped upon those created in his image. He knew we would struggle with temptations to sin. He knew we would cause wars and endless trouble in this world. He knew we would be selfish and greedy and seek to punish those who disagreed with us. But his gift of salvation offered us forgiveness for all our sins. But we must be willing to pay the price of self sacrifice in order to have the peace that only He can give.
The difference in the woman stirring up trouble in the neighborhood because her view of the lake was blocked and Jesus coming to divide people was that he was stirring the hearts of men and women to either believe in him or reject him. His purpose had eternal consequences. And everyone must choose which path to follow. Belief or disbelief in the Savior of the world. The woman next door stirred up trouble because her feelings were hurt. She could have bought the house across the street and had a more magnificent view of the lake. But no. She chose the path of hard resistance, and it cost her nearly everything. Jesus chose the path of dying on the cross for all mankind to save us from losing our souls. He obeyed his Father’s will to die for our sins so we wouldn’t have to.
In the midst of a troubled world, Jesus does bring peace to hurting hearts and wounded souls. He offers forgiveness and is waiting for us to respond. We can have peace in a troubled world if only we turn our hearts toward Him.
Mercy for the Day 